翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Joey Yung discography
・ Joey Zasa
・ Joey Zimmerman
・ Joey's Case
・ Joey's Seafood Restaurants
・ Joey's Song
・ Joey's Song (CD series)
・ Joeystarr
・ Jofa
・ Jofegan, California
・ Joff Ellen
・ JoFF Rae
・ Joffa
・ Joffa Corfe
・ Joffe
Joffe v. Google, Inc.
・ Joffel van der Westhuizen
・ Joffre (shipwreck)
・ Joffre cake
・ Joffre Cogeneration Plant
・ Joffre Desilets
・ Joffre Guerrón
・ Joffre Lakes Provincial Park
・ Joffre Pachito
・ Joffre Soares
・ Joffre Stewart
・ Joffre's pipistrelle
・ Joffre, Alberta
・ Joffre, California
・ Joffre, Pennsylvania


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Joffe v. Google, Inc. : ウィキペディア英語版
Joffe v. Google, Inc.

Joffe v. Google, Inc. is a federal lawsuit between Ben Joffe and Google, Inc. entered official Supreme Court jurisdiction in November 2010. Joffe claimed that Google broke one of the Wiretap Legislation segments when they intruded on the seemingly “public” wireless networks of private homes through their Street View application. Although Google tried to appeal their case multiple times, the courts favored Joffe’s side. Litigation continues.
==Background==
In 2007, Google launched its Street View project, an addendum to the Google Maps feature which captured street-level images from various cities in the US and around the world. Street View vehicles had the ability to intercept and store a vast amount of Wi-fi data from nearby home network due to the intricate technological set up Google created in order to take the pictures in the first place. Google acknowledged in May 2010 that its Street View vehicles had been collecting fragments of payload data from unencrypted Wi-fi networks. This also included any information connected to the internet which was hacked, such as personal emails and passwords. In total Google collected about 600 gigabytes of information from 30 different countries.
The Joffe v. Google court case was filed on in November 2010, when Ben Joffe called out Street View for breaching the Wiretap Legislation Act. Joffe, representing the voice of the complainants, configured that Google ruptured the Act, which regulates the collection of actual content of wire and electronic communications and prohibits the intentional interception, use, or disclosure of wire and electronic communications unless a statutory exception applies. The extensive procedure that involved an appeal by Google lasted until the conclusion in June 2013.
The federal wiretap statute requires someone to get a wiretap order before they monitor or record an individual’s or company’s communication. It regulates the collection of actual content of wire and electronic communication. Under the act it is illegal to intentionally or purposefully:
1.Intercept, disclose, or use the contents of
2.Any wire, oral, or electronic communication


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Joffe v. Google, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.